Global gold jewellery consumption fell 17% y/y to 313t, the weakest third quarter in our data series back to 2000
The value of Q3 demand, meanwhile, edged 2% higher y/y to US$43bn, with y-t-d value up 15% to US$130bn
High prices continued to dominate the sector, with consumers across most regions opting for lower-carat, lighter-weight or smaller items.
Tonnes
Q3'25
Q3'26
y/y % change
World total
376.4
312.9
-17
India
125.0
99.9
-20
China, P.R. Mainland
84.1
65.7
-22
Global gold jewellery consumption fell y/y for the 13th consecutive quarter in Q3. Demand fell to 313t – the weakest third quarter in our data series; below even the pandemic-affected Q3’20 total of 331t.
Demand nevertheless recovered 12% q/q, led by seasonal recoveries in China and India and, at times during the quarter, some support from lower prices.
High prices remained the key constraint on demand in Q3. Consumers generally continued to favour lighter-weight and lower-carat purchases. The y/y weakness in volumes was widespread, with China and India together accounting for a large share of the decline.
The divergence between volume and value remained a prominent theme. Despite the tonnage decline, the global value of Q3 jewellery demand grew modestly y/y to US$43bn. Across the first nine months of the year the divergence is more stark: jewellery demand volumes fell 19% to 889t, the lowest y-t-d total in our data series, while value increased 15% to almost US$130bn.
Chart 6: Gold jewellery volumes saw the weakest third quarter on record, while spending continued to grow y/y
Quarterly gold jewellery demand by market/region, tonnes and US$bn
GDT Q3 2026: Jewellery 1
Sources:
ICE Benchmark Administration,
Metals Focus,
World Gold Council; Disclaimer
*Data as of 30 September 2026
China
Chinese gold jewellery consumption fell 22% y/y to 66t, although demand rebounded sharply from Q2’s seasonal low (+30% q/q). The recovery was uneven: July was typically quiet and August remained subdued as the rising gold price squeezed affordability. Conditions improved in September, when a price pullback encouraged consumer purchases and retailer restocking ahead of the Q4 peak season.
Viewed through a longer-term lens, demand remained anaemic: this was the weakest Q3 since 2006. Elevated gold prices and the additional VAT burden on gold jewellery relative to investment, along with slowing economic growth and continued property-sector weakness weighed on affordability and consumer confidence. These pressures pushed y-t-d jewellery consumption down 27% to 202t.
The market is becoming increasingly polarised. Lightweight, design-led Hard Pure Gold products remained popular, particularly more intricate pieces incorporating gemstones and enamel. At the other end of the spectrum, heavier pieces with low labour charges gained traction when the price dipped in September, appealing to consumers seeking both aesthetic and investment value.
Spending remained considerably more resilient than volumes: Q3 demand value fell just 4% y/y to US$9bn, while y-t-d spending rose 6% to almost US$30bn.
Looking ahead, seasonal factors should support a further recovery in Q4, with the National Day holiday in early October starting the peak sales season on a positive note. Barring another sharp rise in the gold price, volumes may strengthen as consumers adapt to current price levels and the VAT regime, while Hard Pure Gold products are expected to remain relatively resilient.
India
Indian gold jewellery consumption fell 20% y/y to 100t, the weakest third quarter since 2020. But demand recovered from a subdued Q2, supported by festive buying.
Y-t-d demand was 18% lower y/y at 241t. Yet spending remained considerably more robust: Q1-Q3 total demand value rose 19% to US$38bn.1
Affordability remained the overriding constraint: the average domestic gold price in Q3’26 was around 45% higher than a year earlier. Consumers therefore continued to gravitate towards lighter-weight pieces as well as lower-carat and studded jewellery, reducing the fine-weight gold content of their purchases.
Seasonal factors also played an important role. The later festive calendar shifted some demand that would normally fall in Q3 into Q4, limiting the quarter’s recovery.2
Concern over rural incomes added to the pressure as monsoon rainfall remained below average across much of the country. Demand in South India, however, benefited from regional festivals.3
The emphasis on lightweight, lower-carat and studded products extends a trend visible throughout 2026. Diamond jewellery sales reportedly performed well as retailers promoted diamond-studded jewellery in 18k, 14k and 9k; this strategy allows retailers to maintain margins despite selling lower gold volumes.
Middle East and Turkey
Jewellery demand in the Middle East remained weak, as high gold prices, pressure on household purchasing power and continuing geopolitical uncertainty – notable in anaemic tourist numbers – combined to constrain discretionary purchases across the region.
The UAE recorded one of the sharpest declines, down 29% y/y to 4t, while demand in Saudi Arabia fell 12% to 8t. In Egypt, household finances were squeezed by reduced subsidies, persistent inflation and exceptionally high interest rates, limiting gold jewellery purchases. Iranian demand declined 17% to 5t as the ongoing war strained consumer sentiment and disrupted daily life.
Turkey proved relatively resilient by comparison. Demand slipped just 4% y/y to 7t, although it was 15% lower q/q. Consumer sentiment was subdued due to persistent high inflation, domestic political concerns and broader geopolitical uncertainties. The seasonal boost from wedding-related buying failed to offset these pressures.
Chart 7: No region was spared the y/y decline in gold jewellery volume
Y/y change in Q3 jewellery demand by market/region, %
GDT Q3 2026: Jewellery 2
Sources:
Metals Focus,
World Gold Council; Disclaimer
*Data as of 30 September 2026
US and Europe
US gold jewellery demand fell 18% y/y to 21t. Consumers continued to respond to high prices through lighter-weight and lower-carat products, extending the downward trend in volume.
European jewellery consumption also remained soft, falling 11% y/y to 11t – the weakest third quarter since 2020. High prices remained the dominant constraint.
Weakness was broad-based across the region, but France saw the sharpest decline, down 19% y/y. The UK proved comparatively resilient, with demand down 7% y/y.
The broad volume/value divergence continues in both regions. Despite the sharp tonnage decline, spending on gold jewellery in the US was on par with Q3’25 at US$3bn. The value of European demand grew 10% to a third quarter record of US$1.5bn, with particularly strong value growth in the UK (+14%) and Italy (+13%).
ASEAN markets
Jewellery demand remained weak across ASEAN markets as affordability pressures encouraged consumers to continue buying lighter-weight or lower-carat jewellery.
High gold prices continued to shape jewellery buying across ASEAN, encouraging consumers to favour lighter-weight and lower-carat pieces. Indonesian consumers remained cautious amid challenging economic conditions, while Malaysia saw similarly subdued demand
Thailand improved from Q2, helped by a recovery in consumer buying, although volumes remained below those of Q3 last year. Vietnam was again the weakest of the major regional markets, posting a 39% y/y drop.
Rest of APAC
Japanese jewellery demand fell 20% y/y, as elevated prices continued to weigh on buying of daily wear and bridal jewellery. Meanwhile the fact that prices were relatively rangebound throughout the quarter discouraged quasi-investment buying.
In South Korea, a preference for lighter-weight and lower-carat products continued to constrain gold jewellery consumption despite some support from bridal demand.
Australia was comparatively resilient; demand remained virtually unchanged y/y, rebounding from the weak Q2 level.
Table 2: Jewellery demand in selected countries, tonnes
Q3'25
Q4'25
Q1'26
Q2'26
Q3'26
q/q % change
y/y % change
India
125.0
145.3
66.1
75.1
99.9
33
-20
Pakistan
3.7
3.9
3.5
3.5
3.1
-10
-15
Sri Lanka
1.0
0.9
1.1
0.9
0.9
-1
-11
Greater China
90.7
89.0
92.2
55.7
71.9
29
-21
China PR Mainland
84.1
81.9
86.3
50.5
65.7
30
-22
Hong Kong SAR
5.8
6.2
4.8
4.3
5.5
27
-5
Taiwan Province of China
0.8
0.9
1.1
0.9
0.7
-17
-13
Japan
3.3
4.0
3.0
2.2
2.7
19
-20
Indonesia
3.8
5.4
3.3
3.0
3.1
2
-18
Malaysia
2.3
2.4
2.9
2.1
1.8
-17
-21
Singapore
1.4
1.4
1.5
1.4
1.1
-18
-17
Korea Republic of
2.5
2.4
3.9
2.8
2.2
-20
-10
Thailand
2.1
2.3
1.7
1.6
1.9
23
-10
Vietnam
2.2
2.4
3.0
1.8
1.4
-24
-39
Australia
1.8
2.3
1.3
1.0
1.7
73
-1
Middle East
33.4
35.0
33.2
32.2
26.2
-19
-22
Saudi Arabia
9.3
9.0
12.7
10.3
8.2
-20
-12
UAE
6.4
7.5
4.7
5.6
4.5
-19
-29
Kuwait
2.4
2.8
1.8
2.2
1.7
-20
-29
Egypt
4.4
5.1
5.2
4.9
3.8
-22
-12
Islamic Republic of Iran
6.5
5.4
5.0
5.4
5.4
0
-17
Other Middle East
4.4
5.1
3.8
3.9
2.5
-34
-43
Turkey
7.1
7.7
6.9
8.1
6.9
-15
-4
Russian Federation
10.1
11.0
6.7
7.2
9.4
31
-7
Americas
34.5
50.1
20.7
30.5
29.1
-5
-16
United States
25.6
36.8
13.4
21.7
21.0
-4
-18
Canada
2.4
4.6
1.6
2.0
1.9
-4
-21
Mexico
3.2
3.7
2.7
3.0
3.0
0
-5
Brazil
3.3
5.0
3.0
3.8
3.2
-16
-5
Europe ex CIS
12.0
23.5
8.2
12.5
10.7
-15
-11
France
2.2
5.0
2.0
2.4
1.8
-26
-19
Germany
1.9
3.3
0.8
2.0
1.7
-15
-11
Italy
2.5
6.2
1.4
2.9
2.3
-20
-8
Spain
1.9
2.5
1.8
1.9
1.7
-9
-10
United Kingdom
3.5
6.5
2.1
3.4
3.2
-4
-7
Switzerland
-
-
Austria
-
-
Other Europe
-
-
Total above
336.8
389.0
259.3
241.6
273.9
13
-19
Other & stock change
39.7
46.6
35.9
38.9
39.0
0
-2
World total
376.4
435.6
295.2
280.5
312.9
12
-17
Source: Metals Focus, Refinitiv GFMS, ICE Benchmark Administration, World Gold Council
All references to LBMA Gold Price are used with the permission of ICE Benchmark Administration Limited and have been provided for informational purposes only. ICE Benchmark Administration Limited accepts no liability or responsibility for the accuracy of the prices or the underlying product to which the prices may be referenced. Other content is the intellectual property of the respective third party and all rights are reserved to them.
The use of the statistics in this information is permitted for the purposes of review and commentary (including media commentary) in line with fair industry practice, subject to the following two pre-conditions: (i) only limited extracts of data or analysis be used; and (ii) any and all use of these statistics is accompanied by a citation to World Gold Council and, where appropriate, to Metals Focus or other identified copyright owners as their source. World Gold Council is affiliated with Metals Focus.
The World Gold Council and its affiliates do not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information nor accept responsibility for any losses or damages arising directly or indirectly from the use of this information.
This information is for educational purposes only and by receiving this information, you agree with its intended purpose. Nothing contained herein is intended to constitute a recommendation, investment advice, or offer for the purchase or sale of gold, any gold-related products or services or any other products, services, securities or financial instruments (collectively, “Services”). This information does not take into account any investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any particular person.
Diversification does not guarantee any investment returns and does not eliminate the risk of loss. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. The resulting performance of any investment outcomes that can be generated through allocation to gold are hypothetical in nature, may not reflect actual investment results and are not guarantees of future results. The World Gold Council and its affiliates do not guarantee or warranty any calculations and models used in any hypothetical portfolios or any outcomes resulting from any such use. Investors should discuss their individual circumstances with their appropriate investment professionals before making any decision regarding any Services or investments.
This information may contain forward-looking statements, such as statements which use the words “believes”, “expects”, “may”, or “suggests”, or similar terminology, which are based on current expectations and are subject to change. Forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties. There can be no assurance that any forward-looking statements will be achieved. World Gold Council and its affiliates assume no responsibility for updating any forward-looking statements.
Information regarding the LBMA Gold Price
The LBMA Gold Price is used by the World Gold Council with permission under license by ICE Benchmark Administration Limited and is subject to the restrictions set forth here (www.gold.org/terms-and-conditions).
Information regarding QaurumSM and the Gold Valuation Framework
Note that the resulting performance of various investment outcomes that can be generated through use of Qaurum, the Gold Valuation Framework and other information are hypothetical in nature, may not reflect actual investment results and are not guarantees of future results. Neither World Gold Council (including its affiliates) nor Oxford Economics provides any warranty or guarantee regarding the functionality of the tool, including without limitation any projections, estimates or calculations.