Tariff news and inflation helped but momentum effects including ETF outflows, countered, to leave gold flat for the month.
Looking forward
Tariffs are starting to bite, but not where intended, pushing stagflation risks higher and hamstringing several central banks ahead of their June meetings.
A bumpy May finishes flat
Gold prices ended the month of May almost flat (-0.7%) at US$3,278, albeit with some intra-month volatility. Year-to-date, gold remains up a staggering 26% (Table 1).
Our Gold Return Attribution Model (GRAM) suggests that tariff-related policy risk, a rise in inflation expectations (both Risk and Uncertainty factors) and lagged follow-through from the dollar plunge in April contributed positively, while ETF outflows and the strong gold return in April (both Momentum factors) were drags on returns in May (Chart 1).
ETF outflows of US$1.8bn (-19t) were dominated by North America (-US$1.5bn, -16t), on a pause in tariff tensions. Following a sizeable drop in COMEX managed money net longs in April, investors increased net positions slightly by the equivalent of US$0.5bn (4t) in May. They remain well off the highs reached in December 2024 (35% net long as a % of open interest) sitting just above 13%.
Chart 1: Momentum factors proved a drag, while political risk, inflation and the US dollar supported the May return
Key drivers of gold’s return by month*
GMC May 2025: Chart 1
Sources:
Bloomberg,
World Gold Council; Disclaimer
*Data to 31 May 2025. Our Gold Return Attribution Model (GRAM) is a multiple regression model of monthly gold price returns, which we group into four key thematic driver categories of gold’s performance: economic expansion, risk & uncertainty, opportunity cost, and momentum. These themes capture motives behind gold demand; most importantly, investment demand, which is considered the marginal driver of gold price returns in the short run. The ‘residual’ represents the percentage change in the gold price that is not explained by factors already included. Results shown here are based on analysis covering a five-year estimation period using monthly data. Alternative estimation periods and data frequencies are available on Goldhub.com.
Table 1: Gold prices ended May flat, as profit-taking battled solid fundamentals ahead
Gold price and performance in key currencies*
USD (oz)
EUR (oz)
JPY (g)
GBP (oz)
CAD (oz)
CHF (oz)
INR (10g)
RMB (g)
TRY (oz)
AUD (oz)
May price*
3,278
2,888
15,176
2,435
4,503
2,695
95,058
768
128,473
5,096
May return*
-0.7%
-0.7%
0.2%
-1.6%
-1.3%
-0.7%
1.2%
-1.4%
1.1%
-1.3%
Y-t-d return*
25.6%
14.6%
15.0%
16.8%
19.9%
13.8%
25.2%
24.6%
39.2%
20.8%
Record high price*
3,434
3,003
15,707
2,573
4,741
2,808
98,228
830
132,083
5,367
Record high date*
22-Apr 2025
22-Apr 2025
08-May 2025
22-Apr 2025
22-Apr 2025
22-Apr 2025
22-Apr 2025
22-Apr 2025
02-Jun 2025
22-Apr 2025
Source: Bloomberg, World Gold Council *As of 31 May 2025. Based on the LBMA Gold Price PM in USD, expressed in local currencies, except for India and China where the MCX Gold Price PM and Shanghai Gold Benchmark PM are used, respectively.
Tariff tremors
A decision by US federal courts to block the Trump administration’s sweeping tariffs lit a relief rally in risk assets on 29 May. However, this might only be temporary as several options appear available to the administration to sidestep the judement.1 For now we assume little change.
Consensus sees tariffs as ultimately inflationary (See Chart 3). Yet only a faint ripple, like in the Jurassic Park water glass, has appeared so far. Official inflation data remains soft but the unofficial Truflation2 measure has picked up firmly (Chart 2).
And the reason it’s expected is that despite the US administration’s steadfast claim that tariff countries will pay, data hasn’t confirmed it yet and markets are unsure.
Chart 2: Official data not showing inflation…yet
Change in inflation measures since 1 April*
GMC May 2025: Chart 2
Sources:
Bloomberg,
TruLabs posts on X,
World Gold Council; Disclaimer
*Data from 1 April 2025 to 31 May 2025. Truflation is a real-time estimate of goods inflation calculated by TruLabs.
Let them eat tariffs
So who does foot the bill - the exporter, the importer, or the end consumer? So far, it appears that exporters are not absorbing the tariffs as US import prices, which exclude tariffs, are unchanged (Chart 2). If exporters like China were absorbing, those prices should be lower.3
Producer price index (PPI) data from April – which excludes imports – suggested a contraction in margins as capital equipment surged but core finished consumer goods did not. And final demand trade services prices, a proxy for margins, dropped by 1.6%.4
At least officially, and for now, US companies appear to be eating the tariffs, something which the public admonishment of Amazon and Walmart’s attempt to pass on tariffs to consumers seems to back up.5
Stag, meet flation
But the expectation is that sooner or later, consumers will also feel the pinch. These dynamics of weaker margins and higher consumer prices have a stagflationary whiff about them, as consensus expectations lay bare (Chart 3).
Chart 3: Consensus expectations are stagflationary
Consensus GDP, CPI and unemployment forecast*
GMC May 2025: Chart 3
Sources:
Bloomberg,
World Gold Council; Disclaimer
*Data as of 31 May 2025.
Prior research shows that stagflation is an environment that particularly favours gold.
The theory behind it is quite simple:
Bonds suffer because inflation is higher
Cyclical commodities suffer because growth is lower
Equities suffer because margins contract as sales fall while costs rise.
Historically it hasn’t always played out like this, but, on average, stagflationary episodes have been quite good for gold relative to stocks, cyclical commodities and bonds. But we don’t necessarily have to wait for such an environment to play out. Further analysis suggests that stagflationary expectations are nearly as influential in driving gold’s relative average outperformance (Chart 4), whether we get there or not.
Chart 4: Stagflationary expectations can also drive gold’s outperformance
Performance of asset classes during stagflationary quarters*
GMC May 2025: Chart 4
Sources:
Bloomberg,
Macrobond,
World Gold Council; Disclaimer
*Quarterly data from Q1 2000 to Q1 2025. Stagflation defined as a quarter of rising GDP y/y growth and falling y/y CPI. These values are weighted by their magnitude so that large moves get a larger weight than small moves. Gold is the LBMA PM price, equities are MSCI USA and bonds are the Bloomberg US Treasury Agg index. ** Cmd represents cyclical commodities: Bloomberg BCOM ex Gold index. Expected stagflation measures the Survey of Professional Forecasters (SPF) 2Q ahead GDP growth and inflation expectations less 1Q ahead expectations. This is to avoid comparing 1Q ahead expectations relative to an ex-post revised actual GDP figure.
In summary
Last month we discussed the Fed’s dilemma in cutting rates, which they acknowledged in their May FOMC minutes.6
Other central banks are in a similar predicament: a surprise inflation surge in April will likely see the Bank of England err on the side of caution on 19 June and hold rates steady.7 The European Central Bank appears a little more concerned about growth and a cut on 5 June before a pause in July is on the cards,8 while the Reserve Bank of India is set for a third consecutive cut on growth concerns on June 6.9 And the Bank of Japan is expected to hold rates steady on 16 June, facing rising inflation alongside tariff-led growth risks.
The challenge the central banks face, particularly the Fed, is having their foot on the break and accelerator at the same time. With the Fed’s next meeting scheduled on 18 June, the market is all but convinced of no change to the policy rate.10
Communication, along with an update to projections, will therefore be key as the Fed watches for hard-data confirmation of a material slowdown while ignoring an expected ‘transitory’ rise in inflation from tariffs.
This could embolden treasury bears and sustain gold support through any rise in yields.
Notwithstanding the temporary setback for Trump’s policies following the US federal court decision, the stagflationary picture continues to develop. But the hitherto strong run-up in gold prices makes incremental gains perhaps harder to achieve.
Diversification does not guarantee any investment returns and does not eliminate the risk of loss. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. The resulting performance of any investment outcomes that can be generated through allocation to gold are hypothetical in nature, may not reflect actual investment results and are not guarantees of future results. The World Gold Council and its affiliates do not guarantee or warranty any calculations and models used in any hypothetical portfolios or any outcomes resulting from any such use. Investors should discuss their individual circumstances with their appropriate investment professionals before making any decision regarding any Services or investments.
This information may contain forward-looking statements, such as statements which use the words “believes”, “expects”, “may”, or “suggests”, or similar terminology, which are based on current expectations and are subject to change. Forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties. There can be no assurance that any forward-looking statements will be achieved. World Gold Council and its affiliates assume no responsibility for updating any forward-looking statements.
Information regarding QaurumSM and the Gold Valuation Framework
Note that the resulting performance of various investment outcomes that can be generated through use of Qaurum, the Gold Valuation Framework and other information are hypothetical in nature, may not reflect actual investment results and are not guarantees of future results. Neither World Gold Council (including its affiliates) nor Oxford Economics provides any warranty or guarantee regarding the functionality of the tool, including without limitation any projections, estimates or calculations.