Highlights

US gold demand weakness reflects a cyclical investment pause, not a breakdown in demand.
The Q1 pullback was primarily driven by short‑term investment dynamics rather than a deterioration in underlying support for gold.

US listed gold backed ETFs reversed course late in the quarter.
Record monthly outflows of 85t in March erased inflows accumulated earlier in Q1 amid risk‑off conditions, elevated positioning, and higher opportunity costs.

Bar and coin investment provided a partial offset.
Demand rose y/y in both volume and value as retail interest remained resilient, supported by healthy two‑way activity and a preference for smaller bar sizes.

The outlook remains constructive despite near-term volatility.
Geopolitical uncertainty, policy‑rate uncertainty, and broader macro risks continue to underpin the longer‑term case for US gold investment. 

A challenging start for US gold demand 

ETF outflows offset strength in bar and coin investment

Total US gold demand softened in Q1, falling to 33t, around one‑third of its 10‑year quarterly average. The decline was driven primarily by a sharp reversal in physically backed gold ETF demand during March.

US-listed physically backed gold ETFs recorded record monthly outflows of 85t in March, more than offsetting the 69t of inflows accumulated earlier in the quarter. Risk‑off conditions, elevated positioning, higher opportunity costs and investors’ need to raise liquidity weighed on ETF demand, with gold among the likely assets sold following its strong price performance earlier in the year.

Bar and coin investment partially offset ETF weakness, posting y/y gains in both volume and value terms. Market commentary points to healthy two‑way activity, with continued retail interest and a shift in preference toward smaller bar-sized products.

Jewellery demand is seasonal and typically weakens in Q1, but volumes fell to a record low this quarter. Unlike most other regions, where higher prices drove record first‑quarter jewellery spending, the value of US jewellery demand recorded a mild y/y decline, reflecting affordability pressures.

In technology, steady growth in electronics demand supported US gold fabrication as rising prices continued to weigh on dentistry and other industrial uses.

Overall, Q1 reflected a mixed picture for US gold demand, with ETF outflows and jewellery outweighing strength in other segments. However, ongoing geopolitical tensions, uncertainty surrounding the next Federal Reserve chair, and broader macroeconomic risks leave the core drivers outlined in our 2026 Outlook firmly in place. 

Table 1: Quarterly US gold demand by sector, tonnes*

Demand (t)Q1’25Q2’25Q3’25Q4’25Q1’26%Δ q/q%Δ y/y
Jewellery23.329.525.336.713.1-64%-44%
Technology17.415.317.017.418.35%5%
Bar and coin15.97.813.522.618.1-20%14%
ETFs132.770.4137.596.4-16.4-117%-112%
Total189.3123.0193.3173.133.1-81%-83%

*For an explanation of these terms, please see the notes and definitions download: Gold Demand & Supply by Country | World Gold Council
Source: Metals Focus, World Gold Council

 

Chart 1: US gold demand starts 2026 under pressure from ETF outflows

Total demand by sector in tonnes and average quarterly LBMA PM gold price (US$/oz)*

US GDT Q1 2026: Chart 1

Sources: Metals Focus, ICE Benchmark Administration; Disclaimer

*Data as of 31 March 2026. Technology demand is measured on a fabrication basis (all elements of Tech are fabrication, including dental).

ETF demand reverses course in March

Investment via ETFs over the past ten years has, on average, represented around 38% of quarterly net US gold demand, but strong gold price performance resulted in six consecutive quarters of inflows. 

As a result, last year was the strongest year of US$ inflows on record and the second highest in tonnage terms, with ETFs averaging 73% of total net demand. This trend temporarily reversed in Q1 (Chart 2). 

 

Chart 2: Gold ETFs have recently led, but not this time around

Breakdown of quarterly net demand*

US GDT Q1 2026: Chart 2

Sources: Metals Focus, World Gold Council; Disclaimer

*Data as of 31 March 2026. Net jewellery and technology demand computed assuming 90% of recycling comes from jewellery and 10% from technology.

Several drivers that had previously supported ETF demand were put on hold late in the quarter and became key contributors to the weakness:

  • Risk-off selling: Operation Epic Fury1 triggered broad de-risking, likely prompting US investors to raise liquidity by selling winners such as gold
  • Elevated CTA pressure: Commodity Trading Advisors (CTAs) entered mid‑March with elevated long positioning and appear to have amplified downside price momentum, forcing weaker hands to capitulate
  • Higher opportunity costs: a stronger dollar, higher rates, and delayed rate cut expectations weighed on gold demand.

However, a single-month reduction in demand does not suggest that the gold ETF bull market has come to an end.

It is important to put recent developments into perspective and recognise that US ETFs had reported positive demand for six consecutive quarters (and nine consecutive months). Absent the perfect storm of events that unfolded in March, flows were on pace to record a seventh consecutive quarterly inflow.

Furthermore, the only other instance of at least six consecutive quarters of positive demand, outside of the initial conditions phase2, occurred during the seven quarters leading up to and including the Global Financial Crisis (Q3’07–Q1’09), when cumulative US gold ETF demand reached 685t.

The key significance here is not only gold’s performance or ETF demand in a single month, quarter, or even year, but also the length and underlying drivers of a bull run (Chart 3).

 

Chart 3: A one-month drawdown ≠ the end of a bull run

US monthly and net cumulative demand, tonnes*

US GDT Q1 2026: Chart 3

Sources: Bloomberg, Company Filings, World Gold Council; Disclaimer

*As of 31 March 2026. 

As a reminder, there have been two prolonged global gold ETF bull runs since their appearance in 2003, lasting 221 and 253 weeks and adding 1,823t and 2,341t, respectively. The most recent run for gold ETFs began in May 2024; 99 weeks in, holdings are up 1,035t. Compared with prior cycles, this represents only around 40%–50% of typical cumulative accumulation (Chart 4).

 

Chart 4: The accumulation phase still has room to run

Global gold ETF holdings (t) across prior bull and bear periods*

US GDT Q1 2026: Chart 4

Sources: Bloomberg, World Gold Council; Disclaimer

*Global ETF holdings as of 3 April 2026. Net tonnage change within each shaded period reflects additions to or reductions in global physically backed gold ETF holdings.

Key US funds snapshot

Table 2: Top four US listed funds based on net inflows*

Fund Flow US$mn
  GLD GLDM IAU IAUM
2023 -1,967 484 -2,966 -38
2024 454 1,073 -31 -141
2025 23,361 8,017 11,151 3,070
Y-t-d -3,341 2,677 -2,754 769
Total 18,508 12,250 5,400 3,659
AUM US$bn
2023 58 6 26 1
2024 73 9 33 1
2025 148 25 68 6
Y-t-d 155 30 71 7
Δ'25 - '24 75 16 35 5
Δ'Ytd - '25 7 4 2 1
Holdings (t)
2023 879 96 399 18
2024 872 110 393 16
2025 1,070 183 494 44
2026 1,047  200 476 48
Δ'25 - '24 198 73 101 27
Δ'Ytd - '25 -23 17 -18 5

*As of 31 March 2026. The funds shown above were selected based on the top four funds with the highest inflows in 2025. For the full list of funds in our universe, see here.
Source: Bloomberg, Company Filings, World Gold Council

North American retail investment 

Below are key takeaways from recent conversations with North American dealers on current market trends:

  • Retail demand integrity remains intact, though two‑way flows and operational stress continue to shape availability, delivery times, and pricing
  • Bar-size polarisation is emerging in US retail demand. There has been strong demand for small-format bars (1g, 5g, 10g), despite elevated premiums compared to larger formats. Some retailers attribute this to retail clients adjusting to higher gold prices.
  • Retailer marketing and sales conversations are increasingly framed around the longer-term narratives of currency debasement and portfolio hedging, and less about short-term price performance
  • Large, recurring orders from mass retailers (e.g. Costco) represent a structural expansion of US retail demand, not a one‑off phenomenon.

Footnotes

  1. U.S. military operation (Operation Epic Fury) launched February 28, 2026, against Iranian targets | US Central Command.

  2. The period following the initial launch of physically backed gold ETFs in 2003, covering their early asset accumulation and adoption phase through 2006.

Disclaimer [+]Disclaimer [-]